People Are Not Real Now
The article title “People Are Not Real” is a provocative one, and it is sure to get people thinking. But what does it really mean?
In a literal sense, of course, people are real. They exist in the physical world, and we can interact with them in a variety of ways. But what about on a more philosophical level? Are people really who they seem to be? Or are they just a collection of thoughts, feelings, and experiences?
Some philosophers believe that people are not real in the sense that they have no fixed essence. They are constantly changing, and there is no one true self. This view is often associated with the Buddhist concept of anatta, or no-self.
Other philosophers believe that people are real, but that our understanding of them is limited. We can never truly know another person’s thoughts, feelings, or experiences. This view is often associated with the idea of the “veil of perception.”
So, are people real? It depends on how you define “real.” In a literal sense, of course, people are real. But on a more philosophical level, the question is much more complex.
There is no easy answer to the question of whether people are real. It is a question that has been debated by philosophers for centuries. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide what they believe.
However, the question of whether people are real is an important one to consider. It can help us to understand ourselves and our relationships with others in a deeper way. It can also help us to be more compassionate and understanding of others, even when we do not fully understand them.
If you are interested in learning more about the philosophy of personal identity, I recommend the following resources:
- The book “The Self and Its Body” by Thomas Metzinger
- The article “The Myth of the Self” by David Chalmers
- The lecture “What Is the Self?” by Derek Parfit
I hope this article has given you some food for thought.
